About
Notices
Conferences
Bureau
Bulletin
Members
Join
Rules
Links
|
5th Framework Programme
Dominique Levieil of DG Fisheries presented the results of the first call of the 5th Framework Programme (Quality of Life) at the EAFE conference in Esbjerg. He highlighted the major shortcomings of last year's proposals that should be considered as we prepare for the next call with deadline of 11 October 2000. Comprehensive information is offered on the website www.cordis.lu/life/calls/200001.htm. Details of other research support (including support for research infrastructure, SME, training fellowships, training networks and accompanying measures) are also available on the website. Further information can also be attained by contacting Dominique on Dominique.LEVIEIL@cec.eu.int.
The list below outlines the major shortcomings thatoverall need to be addressed and improved upon.
Reasons for ineligibility
Late arrival of the proposal Missing or incomplete forms Lack of anonymity in part B Area not open in the deadline
Scientific/technological quality and innovation
Objectives not specific Over-ambitious or unrealistic goals Lack on innovation and originality No review of state of the art Innovation not linked to programme objectives Missing working hypotheses Confusing presentation of work packages Overlapping tasks, lacking integration Deliverables unclear or insufficient
Methodologies
Insufficient multi-disciplinarity/integration of domains, tasks or teams Data quality assurance and control procedures Sampling design No justification for model use/development Validation of models not envisaged Standardisation procedures Lack of risk assessment/contingency plan
Resources, partnership and management
Too many partners with overlapping expertise Management structure poor/overcomplicated Partnership unbalanced, incomplete, lacking desirable partners Roles of partners/subcontractors unclear Insufficient time/resources for synthesis Budget oversized relative to work and outcomes Costs not justified Unjustified/unbalanced budget between partners
European added value and contribution the CFP
No geographical balance No contribution to solving European problems European dimension not quantified No impact on legislation, standardisation, policies (CFP)
Community social objectives
No quantified impact on quality of life Impact on employment and development of skills Not in the interest of consumers/citizens No positive impact on environment
Economic development and S&T prospects
Stakeholders/end users not identified/targeted or involved No description of way of exploitation, role of industry, potential market No description of impact on European competitiveness Missing commitment of industrial partner Missing or incomplete dissemination strategy
Table of Contents | Next Article: Cost and Earnings Study - Sicily
|
|